Peer review audit of occupational health reports--process and outcomes

Impact of peer review audit on occupational health report quality

BACKGROUND In a previous report, we described the implementation of a formal process for peer review of occupational health (OH) reports and a method of assessment of the outcomes of this process. The initial audit identified that 27% of OH reports required modifications. AIMS To assess formally, following implementation of this process, if changes in practice had occurred, i.e. whether fewer...

Audit or assessment tools for occupational health letters or reports.

Lalloo et al. [1] are to be commended for undertaking further research on methods of auditing the process and outputs of occupational physicians’ reports, which usually take the form of correspondence with referring managers. To supplement their literature search, readers should be aware that your journal has published research regarding this issue in the past and occupational physicians’ repor...

Occupational health and safety management audit instruments: A literature review

the impact of peer review on efl reviewers writing proficiency

امروزه تصحیح همکلاسی در کلاسهای نگارش یکی از اجزاء لاینفک کلاسهای دانش آموز محور است. تاثیرات مفید تصحیح همکلاسی بر زبان آموزان، معلمان را متقاعد کرده است که علیرغم صرف زمان، انرژی و توان بسیار، از این شیوه ی آموزشی در کلاسهای آموزش نگارش بهره بگیرند. تحقیق حاضر بر آن است تا با مقایسه دو گروه از یادگیرندگان زبان انگلیسی، تاثیر تصحیح همکلاسی را بر توانایی نوشتاری آنها نشان دهد. 122 خانم زبان آمو...

The peer-review process.

Most authors experience that “sinking feeling” when reviewers’ comments and recommendations lead to rejection of a manuscript or the need for multiple revisions. It is important to bear in mind that this happens to most, if not all, scientists. Many times the reviewer or editor is correct, and with suitable revision, a better paper is ultimately published. Sometimes it is not. The author can th...